Cases 111 - 120 of 442
Campos v. National L S, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
Omar Campos
Defendant:
National L S, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LeBlanc v. C.R. England, Inc et,al
as 3:2013cv00282
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc and Jeffrey Price
Plaintiff:
Taynereon LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buckley et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Henry J Buckley , Gilbert A Curtis , Ronald Morale and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Marquez et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
Iris Marquez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Thibodeaux v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wallace v. Pinnacle Family of Companies
as 3:2012cv03931
Plaintiff:
Cecil H Wallace, Jr
Defendant:
Pinnacle Family of Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oney v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 1:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Oney
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ruby et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard G Ruby
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ruby et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Ruby
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Weaver v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv00585
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Edgar D. Weaver
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
