Cases 111 - 120 of 1,675
Belde v. Bio-Medical Applications of Texas, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Donna Belde
Defendant:
Bio-Medical Applications of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Troutman v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Derek T. Troutman
Defendant:
TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and TEVA Sales and Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Marbley v. Teamster Local 988 et al
as 4:2022cv03396
Plaintiff:
Joshua Marbley
Defendant:
Teamster Local 988, Mr. Michael Offord, Mr. Michael Honer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FILING ERROR
as 3:2022cv00426
Defendant:
Ahern Rentals, Inc. dba Ahern Rentals and Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Butler et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Caleb Butler and Jeremy Pennington
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Walsh v. Killeen Daily Herald
as 6:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Killeen Daily Herald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Mejia v. Fidelity Investments
as 4:2022cv00903
Defendant:
Sofia Mejia and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dedmon v. Shell Exploration & Production Company et al
as 4:2021cv03371
Plaintiff:
Robert Dedmon
Defendant:
Shell Exploration & Production Company and Shell Trading Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez et al v. National Freight Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
Luis Lopez and Ambioris Jimenez
Defendant:
National Freight Inc and NFI Interactive Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Breaux v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 3:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Yndia Breaux
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
