Cases 111 - 120 of 1,724
Canada v. Nelson et al
as 0:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Doug Nelson, Alex Bunger, Robyn Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Wegner et al
as 0:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Jyron Mendale Young
Defendant:
Officer Chris Wegner and Officer Amanda Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. Daniels et al
as 0:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Perales
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Booth
as 0:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Clifton Ingram
Defendant:
Sgt. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Kensy et al
as 0:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Heather Kensy, Mr. Cowe and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiege v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jared Fiege
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Todd Leonard, Saint Louis County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maloney v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Maloney, Jr
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Sherburne County Jail, U.S. Marshall Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. Grenier et al
as 0:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Defendant:
P. Grenier and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
