Cases 121 - 130 of 16,838
Allmon v. O' Malley
as 2:2024at00305
Plaintiff:
Mark C Allmon
Defendant:
Mr. Martin J O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(HC) Briggs v. Schuyler
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
C Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS) Allmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Allmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
G. et al v. Roblox Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
L. G., O. R., D. C. and others
Defendant:
Roblox Corporation, Satozuki Limited B.V., Studs Entertainment Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lynden Vanatti et al v. J. Gates et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Lynden Vanatti
Defendant:
J. Gates, O. Pavon, J. Ebaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Brown v. Andes
as 2:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Brown
Respondent:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jose C. Molina Ruiz et al
as 8:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jose Molina C. Ruiz, Juana C. Ramirez Tapia and Does 1 to 10
Hickman v. Preston et al
as 3:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jabar Hickman
Defendant:
Kathryn Preston, Wanda C. E. Beanmon and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PC) Alexander v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Defendant:
J. Lynch, G. Jones, Ponyay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
