Cases 121 - 130 of 172
Bowers v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04415
Plaintiff:
Teresa L. Bowers
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bowers v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 4:2013mc02354
Plaintiff:
Robert D Bowers
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Marathon Oil Corporation, Enterprise Products Partners LP and others
Roberts v. Whitman et al
as 4:2013cv00052
Defendant:
Warden Bowers, Major Lujan, Cpt McQuary and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Swift et.al.
as 4:2013cv00048
Defendant:
O Arteaga, Roger Bowers, SGT. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Darryll Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madrid v. Jeter et al
as 4:2013cv00041
Defendant:
Michelle Beise, Rodger Bowers, Imer Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Mike Madrid, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Bowers et al
as 4:2013cv00029
Defendant:
Roger Bowers, Ricky Lujan and Daniel McQuary
Plaintiff:
Arthur White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00413
Petitioner:
Thomas Ray Bowers
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perez v. Martinez et al
as 5:2013cv00242
Defendant:
R. Almendarez, R. Bowers, K. Bright and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco U. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
