Cases 121 - 130 of 331
Peck v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv01495
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Charlene Clarkson, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rush v. Cortez-Masto
as 3:2012cv00443
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez-Masto
Plaintiff:
John Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The State of Nevada by its Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto v. Renown Health
as 3:2012cv00409
Defendant:
Renown Health
Plaintiff:
The State of Nevada by its Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Jacobson v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Defendant:
Michael Bongard, Catherine Cortez-Masto, E. Emmanuel and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Glenn Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vail v. Cortez-Masto, et al.
as 2:2012cv01148
Defendant:
John Arana, Conrad Hafen, Scott J. Kipper and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NOT USED
as 3:2012cv00359
Defendant:
John Arana, Scott J. Kipper, Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv01128
Defendant:
C. Brown, Cheryl Burson, Julio Calderin and others
Plaintiff:
Tarz Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lender Processing Services, Inc. v. Cortez Masto
as 2:2012cv01122
Defendant:
Catherine Cortez Masto
Plaintiff:
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burdick v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2012cv01055
Defendant:
Nancy Alf, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Mr Hartsell and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Burdick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zana v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv01013
Respondent:
Catherine Cortez-Masto and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
Mark Zana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
