Cases 121 - 130 of 166
Hudson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2011cv06400
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Julie E. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kelly v. Abel et al
as 3:2011cv01178
Defendant:
Gregory E. Abel, Wedge Abels, Shane E. Abma and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Irtifa v. Kurahashi et al
as 3:2011cv01034
Defendant:
Charlie Goh, Internal Revenue Service, Gregory T. Kurahashi and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron M. Irtifa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Haney v. Blumenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00989
Defendant:
Gregory E Abel, Wedge Abels, Sam Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Azonia Haney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company v. Goodpaster et al
as 3:2011cv00775
Defendant:
Julie Ann Dilday, Does 1-10, Sandy Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hardage v. Borigo et al
as 6:2011cv06206
Defendant:
Leeon Aller, Scott Batsch, Angie (Cool) Borigo and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Hardage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ganick v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03068
Defendant:
Thomas Counts and Office Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Ganick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Smith v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2011cv00373
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Plaintiff:
Julie C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
