Cases 121 - 130 of 169
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Corr
as 10-6123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6076
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Kenneth Barbour v. Officer Durham
as 10-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER J. DURHAM, LIEUTENANT MULLINS and SERGEANT COCHRANE
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 10-6011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, Food Service
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 10-6016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (VDOC), KEEFFEE COMMISSARY and VIRGINIA BOARD OF PRISONS
Kenneth Barbour v. Collins, et al
as 10-6022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O W.A. COLLINS, SGT. COCHRANE, LT. COLLINS M. HENSLEY and others
Kenneth Barbour v. Legislation upon Virginia Depa
as 10-6021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
LEGISLATION UPON VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 10-6008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (VDOC) and WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, (W.R.S.P.)
Kenneth Barbour v. Virginia Department of Correct
as 10-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Barbour v. Keeffee Commisaries at VDOC's
as 10-6020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
KEEFFEE COMMISARIES AT VDOC'S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
