Cases 121 - 130 of 936
(PC) Garcia v. Allison et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Lucien Garcia
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Jeff Lynch and C. Kurgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norberto Serna v. David Holbrook, et al
as 23-15095
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORBERTO SERNA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary
(HC) Weece v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
John Weece
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Spells v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55000
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES SPELLS
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. Cisnero, et al
as 22-16951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CISNERO, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, R. MORALES, Associate Warden and others
Andrew Molina v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-70017
Petitioner:
ANDREW S. MOLINA
Respondent:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden
Michael V. Gonez v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Michael V. Gonez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv07367
Plaintiff:
Michael Sr. O'Neal
Defendant:
Secretary Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv02073
Petitioner:
Wendy H. Downs
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broadnax
as 4:2022cv09102
Plaintiff:
Cottrell Broadnax
Defendant:
Unknown, Governor Gavin Newsom, Kern Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
