Cases 121 - 130 of 288
Marshall v. USA
as 3:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Saub v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00414
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Saub
Defendant:
Georgett Phillips, Thomas Potter, Kris Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Emergency Unit for the Marshal Services
as 3:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Emergency Unit for the Marshal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinkleton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Marshall B. Pinkleton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Smith v. Bailey et al
as 1:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
William H. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, Robert Sodorsky, Louis Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00668
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Jones v. United States of America Marshal Service
as 1:2015cv01416
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States of America Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
