Cases 121 - 130 of 10,404
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Quartshezz Leonard Lewis
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
William Hal McCarley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McWilliam v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Donald McWilliam
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Gregory Zachary Monroe
Respondent:
Warden and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbert, Sr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Holbert, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escobedo v. Warden, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Ramiro Escobedo
Respondent:
Warden, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ
as 7:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Patrick A White, Sr
Respondent:
James V. Allred, Jr. (Prison) and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherly v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Rohn M Weatherly
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
