Cases 121 - 130 of 661
Bell v. Bishop et al
as 8:2016cv01990
Petitioner:
Edward Hall Bell
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodwin v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv01991
Petitioner:
Paul A Goodwin
Respondent:
State Of Maryland, Casey M. Campbell and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Graham et al
as 8:2016cv01934
Petitioner:
Michael Adams
Respondent:
Richard Graham and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 8:2016cv01660
Petitioner:
Frederick E Jones
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osborne v. Warden et al
as 8:2016cv01571
Petitioner:
Jeffery Osborne
Respondent:
Warden, ., Baltimore County D A Office, Baltimore County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Acting Warden of WCI et al
as 1:2016cv01476
Petitioner:
Jerome Leslie Allen
Respondent:
Acting Warden of WCI and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Dovey et al
as 1:2016cv01472
Petitioner:
Daryl Kevin Stokes
Respondent:
Richard H. Dovey and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Flood et al
as 8:2016cv01384
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
James Flood, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Flood Jr. et al
as 8:2016cv01350
Petitioner:
Lochild Reed
Respondent:
James Flood Jr. and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ayele v. Warden et al
as 8:2016cv01315
Petitioner:
Michael Ayele
Respondent:
Warden and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
