Cases 121 - 130 of 147
Ladd v. Usp Marion Health Care Services et al
as 5:2015cv00020
Petitioner:
Andra Ladd
Respondent:
Usp Marion Health Care Services, Duncan Brooks, Frank Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dial v. USP McCreary
as 5:2014cv00446
Petitioner:
Shaundelle Dial
Respondent:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kevin Burna Dean Dye
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, USP Big Sandy Staff and Special Investigative Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. USA et al
as 6:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Stephen Desmund Peterson
Defendant:
USA, USP-Victorville Medical Staff, USP-McCreary Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Antwine v. State of Inez Kentucky et al
as 7:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Trent Antwine
Defendant:
State of Inez Kentucky, USP Big Sandy, Prison Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner Bey v. Bureau of Prisons USP McCreary et al
as 6:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kory La'Ron Turner Bey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons USP McCreary, M. Broughton, Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Federal Bureau Prisons et al
as 6:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lester Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Castro v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Louis Castro
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, FBOP and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilmore v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Errick Gilmore
Defendant:
USP McCreary, J.C. Holland, Maruka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
