Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 121 - 130 of 74,227
OptumRx, Inc.In re: OptumRx, Inc.
as 24-3396
Petitioner: In re: OPTUMRX, INC.
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, et al v. NCR Corporation, et al
as 24-1404
Plaintiff: GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP, FORT JAMES CORPORATION and GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
Defendant: NCR CORPORATION, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, INC. and WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff: STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Landon Harrod v. Kenya Lee, et al
as 24-5228
Plaintiff: LANDON HARROD
Defendant: KENYA LEE, ROCKY RUEHLING, CITY OF TULLAHOMA, TN and others
USA v. Wenceslao Vallejo
as 24-5444
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WENCESLAO MARISCAL VALLEJO, aka Edgar Sandoval-Lopez
Ardeth Finley, Jr.
as 24-5445
Petitioner: In re: ARDETH CONDEY FINLEY, JR.
Respondent: KEVIN MAZZA, Warden
USA v. Arturo Hernandez-Pozos
as 24-5446
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARTURO HERNANDEZ-POZOS, aka Arturo Pozos-Herndanez, aka Thomas Benjamin Vallejo, aka Joel Ocelotl-Coyotl, aka Ruben Rodriguez-Ortiz, aka Arturo Hernandez Pozos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
RPM Freight Systems, LLC v. K1 Express, Inc.
as 24-1203
Plaintiff: RPM FREIGHT SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant: K1 EXPRESS, INC.
Nancy Plunk v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 24-5236
Plaintiff: NANCY PLUNK
Appellant: DRAYTON D. BERKLEY
Defendant: SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and VCE, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?