Cases 121 - 130 of 39,854
Brain v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03031
Plaintiff:
Ian C Brain
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gwinn v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03032
Plaintiff:
Margaret M Gwinn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00349
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Burden v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Burden
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bradshaw v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02490
Plaintiff:
Anne Bradshaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kyle-McFarland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Monica Kyle-McFarland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Social Security Commissioner
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Denise Virginia Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scholz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Clarenda A. Scholz
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Kieffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Kieffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
