Cases 121 - 130 of 230,856
Cid v. Gillespie et al
as 3:2024cv02377
Plaintiff:
Jamie Cid
Defendant:
Gillespie and Falfal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Dr. Mann and Dr. Sabben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Legaspy Chacon v. Majors
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy Chacon
Respondent:
Barbara Lee Majors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Barnes
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Bianca R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hernandez v. Covello
as 1:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherrell v. Maui Community Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Sherrell
Defendant:
Maui Community Correctional Center, Department of Public Safety and Jillian Bermejo-Barrera
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Kyrel L. Coleman
Respondent:
James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
