Cases 121 - 130 of 881
CROUCH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv04961
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROUCH
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GOMEZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2017cv04793
Plaintiff:
MIRIAN GOMEZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FLEMING v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv04268
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FLEMING
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2017cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE , MICHAEL STILES , TIMOTHY SUSANIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CYLC v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 2:2017cv03613
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CYLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and ARCHILEEN AYO-DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brooks v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service , Michael Stiles , Timothy Susanin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECHER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BECHER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KONDERTAVAGE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv03143
Plaintiff:
ADAM KONDERTAVAGE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DONNELLY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 2:2017cv02619
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DONNELLY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and PAUL RODDY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wolfkill v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Wolfkill
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
