Cases 121 - 130 of 120,504
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02711
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02712
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02714
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Grayson v. California Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Erick Dontay Grayson
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ford v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Slyvester Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Dept.
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
