Cases 121 - 130 of 20,178
Lurch v. MTA et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Robert Derek Lurch, Jr.
Defendant:
MTA, NYCTA and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Town of Gates et al
as 6:2024cv06094
Plaintiff:
Sean Walker
Defendant:
Town of Gates, Town of Gates Police Department, Matthew Pascarella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02530
Plaintiff:
Hopeton K. Francis
Defendant:
City of New York, Deputy Salmon, Mrs. Colette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Mastrucello et al
as 9:2024cv00219
Defendant:
Daniel Mastrucello, III, Daniel Mastuscello, III, Alice Schunk and others
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 9:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Ms. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saracina v. Papia
as 6:2024cv06199
Plaintiff:
Scott Saracina
Defendant:
Stephen Papia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Kortright et al
as 9:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
L. Kortright, L. Lilly and G. Jergdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirschbaum v. Daily et al
as 9:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
George Kirschbaum
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily, SORC D.J. Decker, Sgt. Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
