Cases 121 - 130 of 7,359
Schubert v. Watson
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner:
Alan Schubert
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2024cv00269
Petitioner:
David Warren Huffman
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caupp v. Parin
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Parin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Rumer et al
as 2:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Skye A. Woods and Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
Kristine Rumer, Annette Chambers and Anette Chambers Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Marcus Lushound Dennis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Treadwell v. USA
as 3:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
Jermaine Treadwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Black v. Hartley et al
as 2:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Miciah Black
Defendant:
Christopher Hartley and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobarak v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Soleiman Mobarak
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Butler County Jail
as 1:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Le-Lon Campbell
Defendant:
Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. DeWine et al
as 2:2023cv03930
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vernell Thompson
Defendant:
Mike DeWine, James Haviland, Larry Bodell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
