Cases 121 - 130 of 351
Lewis v. United States Government et al
as 2:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Harry T Lewis
Defendant:
United States Government, Richard M Gergel and Stanley D Ragsdale
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. 13 USPS Money Orders Valued at 13000 Dollars
as 2:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
13 USPS Money Orders Valued at 13000 Dollars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. Norinko SKS Rifle et al
as 3:2016cv03583
Defendant:
Norinko SKS Rifle, North American Arms .22 Caliber Magnum Pistol, Ruger P95DV 9mm Pistol and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Toyota Camry 2009 VIN #4T1BE46K69U871254
as 7:2015cv04596
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Toyota Camry 2009 VIN #4T1BE46K69U871254
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Nkwocha v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
as 2:2015cv04191
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nkwocha
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. 49990 dollars in US Currency
as 4:2015cv03088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
49990 dollars in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv02523
Plaintiff:
Tony Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. Khera
as 1:2015cv02228
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dilbag S Khera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States of America v. 15710 in US Currency
as 2:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
15710 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 15745 in US Currency
as 3:2014cv04316
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
15745 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
