Cases 121 - 130 of 44,476
(PC) Distin v. US Army et al
as 2:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Phillip Christopher Distin
Defendant:
US Army and CDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rocha v. Monroe, et al.
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Rocha
Defendant:
Atlee M Monroe, James Fontento, M Kieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Silva v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00618
Petitioner:
Joe Silva
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Stone v. CDC Officers et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Stone
Defendant:
CDC Officers, CDC Medical Staff and Tehachapi Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carrasco Carrasco v. Stanislaus County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Rafael Carrasco Carrasco
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff, Well Path, Linda A. McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Madero v. The People
as 1:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Eric Cruz Madero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Flores v. The People
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Joaquin Flores
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Calderon v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Calderon
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Storm v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Z. Storm
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Robert Bonta and B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
