Cases 121 - 130 of 120,371
Kevin Palma Roque v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03561
Petitioner:
Kevin Palma Roque
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Van Keyshone Rollen v. C. Pfeiffer
as 5:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Respondent:
Warden C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00882
Petitioner:
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey and Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diggs v. Hymer et al
as 3:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Michael LaRoy Diggs
Defendant:
Allen Hymer and Armando Pastran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Diaz et al
as 3:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Bruce Carol Wells, JR.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer R. Diaz and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe and Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dicks v. Moseley et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Eric Dicks
Defendant:
H. Moseley, S. Gates, Melinda Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
G. Marquez, D. Baker and David Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Parker v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Akika Parker
Defendant:
Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento Sheriff Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miles v. Sutter County Sherriff et al
as 2:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Sutter County Sherriff, Sutter County Jail and Yuba City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
