Cases 121 - 130 of 52,935
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Isaac et al
as 5:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Phillips Gas Company, Harold Isaac, Karen Isaac and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hatcher v. Yang et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hatcher
Defendant:
Sylvain Yang and Travis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
White et al v. Li et al
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gregory White and Nevada Tate
Defendant:
Haoyong Li, Double Z Trucking, Inc. and MS Transverse Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traditions Health, LLC v. Huffman et al
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Traditions Health, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Huffman, Sharon Reed, Kaycee Funk and others
Majoue et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00375
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
George Majoue and Alice Majoue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
New Dominion LLC et al v. Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
New Dominion LLC and South D LLC
Defendant:
Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
First Church of the Nazarene of Enid v. Church Mutual Insurance Company SI
as 5:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
First Church of the Nazarene of Enid
Defendant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company SI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
