Cases 131 - 140 of 49,986
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Nyc Dept of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Masa v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02902
Plaintiff:
Kevin Masa
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02900
Plaintiff:
Elmer Moreno
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marozzi v. Interlicchia et al
as 6:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
Quentin A. Marozzi
Defendant:
Nicholas Interlicchia, Matthew Daminski, L. Strapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
