Cases 131 - 140 of 17,786
Dawson v. Warden Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Ronald Dawson
Respondent:
Warden Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malvasi v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01105
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tanner v. Muench-McElfresh
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Raymond Tanner
Defendant:
Jennifer Muench-McElfresh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. McCabe et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Delaquan D. Henderson
Defendant:
McCabe, Leana Witdress and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zachery v. Tussey et al.
as 5:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Mario C Zachery and Mario C. Zachery
Defendant:
Christian Tussey, Robert A. Toussant and City of Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corwin v. USA
as 2:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Jeremy Corwin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Eckstein v. Franklin County Corrections II et al.
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections II, Armor Health, Dallas Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 5:2024cv00416
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ross v. USA
as 1:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
