Cases 131 - 140 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Franks et al v. Re/Max Associates et al
as 2:2012cv15038
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Franks and Douglas Dwight Bennett
Defendant:
Re/Max Associates, E-Title Agency, John Graham Realty LLC and others
Graham v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2012cv14491
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Graham
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ralph Godbee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv14150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Litten v. Woodhaven, City of, et al
as 2:2012cv13695
Defendant:
Woodhaven, City of , Woodhaven Police Chief Gordon Chretien , Woodhaven Police Lt. Harwood and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Litten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRAHAM et al v. Bank of America, N.A., as successor and assignee to Countrywide Bank, a Division of Treasury Bank, N.A., and Country Wide Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13574
Plaintiff:
MARK GRAHAM and MARILYN GRAHAM
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., as successor and assignee to Countrywide Bank, a Division of Treasury Bank, N.A., and Country Wide Loans, Inc. and NB Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDLES v. Clay et al
as 2:2012cv12117
Plaintiff:
John Eric SANDLES
Defendant:
Eric L. Clay , John M. Rodger , James L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lucier v. Ecorse, City of, et al
as 2:2012cv12110
Plaintiff:
William Deenene Lucier
Defendant:
Ecorse, City of , Herbert Worthy , Darcel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sandles v. Batista et al
as 2:2012cv11773
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Andrew Batista, George C Steeh, Doug Smith and others
Bonner-Turner v. Ecorse, City of et al
as 2:2012cv10487
Plaintiff:
Zulema Renee Bonner-Turner
Defendant:
Ecorse, City of, Gerald Champagne, James Frierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
