Cases 131 - 140 of 102,642
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grimes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frosch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montemayor v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Frank Montemayor
Defendant:
Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfford v. Ernestine
as 9:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Julye Ernestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfford v. Hyland, III
as 9:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
James Hyland, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte, Stacy Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shead et al v. State of Texas Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Travarus Shead, Enrique Guerra and Barry Emmett
Defendant:
State of Texas Corporation, Greg Abbot, Lieutenant Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
