Cases 131 - 140 of 165,346
Busby v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Wyatt Busby
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. 203rd Judicial District Courts et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
203rd Judicial District Courts, US District Court, Fifth Cir Ct of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
BOP and SCFO - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Lumpkin; Do not docket in 2:24-cv-110. Case is consolidated under 2:24-cv-108.
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Antoino Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. River Bend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Luis Reyes
Defendant:
River Bend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
