Cases 131 - 140 of 4,388
Tena v. Larison
as 4:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Tena
Defendant:
Thomas S Larison and Thomas Larison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tena v. Goodman
as 4:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Maribel Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves #129926 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02471
Petitioner:
Marcus Jeffey Reaves
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whipple v. Maricopa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02238
Plaintiff:
Nathan Whipple
Defendant:
Maricopa, City of, Maricopa Police Department, Mark Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hursey #065273 v. Lamb et al
as 2:2023cv02457
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hursey, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Lamb, Unknown Schealnick, Unknown Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cluff v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Danielle Renae Cluff
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Driggs et al
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Barbara Eileen Gantt
Defendant:
Terisha Dawn Driggs, Sara L Dent, Charles Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goodman
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Brennam et al
as 4:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Vickers
Defendant:
Bridget M Brennam and Brian McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Latham #152032 v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv02429
Plaintiff:
Tomas Latham
Defendant:
B Gibson and Mark T Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
