Cases 131 - 140 of 1,410
Jackson v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01542
Petitioner:
Keith Jackson
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosa v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2022cv01260
Petitioner:
Alexander Rosa
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Churuk v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01385
Petitioner:
Yarslov Churuk
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alston v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01434
Petitioner:
Ira Alston
Respondent:
Angel Quiros and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UI-Hassan v. United States Of America
as 3:2022cv01231
Petitioner:
Mahmoud Ui-Hassan and Mahmood UI-Hassan
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stuart v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01388
Petitioner:
Jessica M. Stuart
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bronfman v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00838
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bryan Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Hess
as 3:2022cv01356
Petitioner:
Robert H Martin
Respondent:
Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Szanyi v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv01253
Petitioner:
Karen Szanyi
Defendant:
Pullen
Respondent:
BOP and T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01190
Petitioner:
Firoz Patel
Respondent:
Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
