Cases 131 - 140 of 3,759
Lahey v. Union County, MS Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Garrie Lahey
Defendant:
Union County, MS Sheriff Dept., Jimmy Edwards and Kayla Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankersley v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Clarence Tankersley
Defendant:
Brandon Smith, Harold Smith, Penny Hamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. USA
as 3:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Xaveriana Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Larry Lewis
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jamar Allen
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Marcus McClure and Darowski Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Cain
as 4:2022cv00196
Petitioner:
Willie Clarence McCall
Respondent:
Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Petitioner:
Bildrick Jackson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trotter v. Loden et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Leon Lamar Trotter
Respondent:
Chad Loden and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denson v. Marshall County Correctional Facility
as 4:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Christopher O. Denson
Respondent:
Marshall County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
