Cases 131 - 140 of 2,501
Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Jackson Peter Chiwanga
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Brown
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGinnes v. Rothrock et al
as 4:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee McGinnes
Defendant:
Katie Rothrock, Mrs Galardo, Mr Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Davis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Younger v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Younger, Jr
Defendant:
Amy Hall, Tulsa Police Department and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Nix et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Keith D Hopper
Defendant:
Ashley Nix, Tanya Wilson, Loretta Radford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Alison Nutt, Lacy Lansdown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, Vic Rigalado, FNU Dobbertin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Byron Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sjodin v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kirk Ardell Sjodin, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
