Cases 131 - 140 of 10,117
DeRemer v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Ross DeRemer
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercado v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Eric Mercado
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Guerrero Valenzuela v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Marcos Alfonso Guerrero Valenzuela
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Amado Pacheco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sarabia v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Mario Santana Sarabia
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stevenson v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
Charlie Stevenson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bogosian v. Washington County
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
James Leroy Bogosian
Respondent:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bloodworth v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Laquintee Bloodworth
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cadabas-Barragan v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Kevin Cadabas-Barragan
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
