Cases 131 - 140 of 22,845
Allen Jr. v. Cass County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy David Allen Jr.
Defendant:
Cass County Detention Center, Linden Police Department, Jose Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ: Case electronically transferred to (Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division).
as 6:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kingston v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Alexander M. Kingston
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Robertson v. Guteriz
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Robertson
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and David Guteriz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leandry v. USA
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Ismael Leandry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
