Cases 131 - 140 of 9,427
Williams v. Laturi et al
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jovan Williams
Defendant:
Steven Laturi, Jeremiah Phipps, Tia Chentnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Ryan Charles Weaver
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Dr Rojas, Dr Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00432
Petitioner:
Grover C Ferguson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Edwards v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Steven A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durley v. Kuffenkam et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Timothy Durley
Defendant:
Kerry L Kuffenkam and Diana L Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Bureau of Health Services et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Dionny L Reynolds
Defendant:
Bureau of Health Services, Ashley Haseleu, Tonya Wesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ronell Hart
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, State of Wisconsin, Dr Jenna Niess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
