Cases 131 - 140 of 5,652
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edge v. USA
as 0:2023cv03828
Petitioner:
Anthony Doane Edge
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robideau v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03402
Petitioner:
Raymond Clyde Robideau
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv03312
Petitioner:
Nikita Dixon
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner Paul Schnell and Warden Tracy Beltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Somerville v. USA
as 0:2023cv03788
Petitioner:
Jarvae Josiah Somerville
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marin-Angel v. Segal
as 0:2023cv03209
Petitioner:
Juana Marin-Angel
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jama v. USA
as 0:2023cv03757
Petitioner:
Abdiweli Mohamed Jama
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Crump v. Schell et al
as 0:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
Willie James Crump
Defendant:
Paul Schell, Tracy Beltz, Ann Blanchol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
