Cases 131 - 140 of 60,001
Allen v. Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Wade Allen
Defendant:
Barrick Gold of North America, Inc. and Turner Staffing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gando v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fatin Sawa Gando
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ettaghi et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Hyatt Ettaghi and Csilla Zsok
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Q.M.E Gunite, Inc v. Central Environmental, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Q.M.E Gunite, Inc
Defendant:
Central Environmental, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
De Darr v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Maria Castro De Darr
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Karyl Clarke
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas, Clark County School District, Brenda Larsen-Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Karyl Clarke
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department, Jacqueline Gravatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Kelvin L. James
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, Madelyn Ackens and Jennifer Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
