Cases 141 - 150 of 9,925
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Rickey W. Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Rochelle, Darren Anderson and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Ronnie Turner
Respondent:
The State of Texas, D. A Sharon Wilson, A.D.A Richard Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Robert Arthur Moses
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Sheadrick Lee Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutchins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Brian Hutchins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emmett v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Barry Patrick Emmett
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02871
Petitioner:
Donald W Owens
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
