Cases 141 - 150 of 358
Sajous v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv23349
Plaintiff:
Alan Rene Sajous
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Complex-Coleman, Florida and Coleman Low Federal Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Cuevas et al
as 1:2017cv23341
Defendant:
Director Thomas Kane, Lieutenant Gwinn, Counselor E. Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Leon Hammonds, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herrera v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv22555
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHITE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G WHITE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
David R. Spencer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leesburg Medical Center, Warden Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gullett-El v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El
Respondent:
Kim Lee Watson, Jim Haskett, Patrick Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kiderlen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2017cv00896
Petitioner:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brestle v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2017cv80403
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Brestle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Scott et al
as 6:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
J.D. Scott, Mr. Gibbs, Merit System Protection Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv20966
Plaintiff:
Avinie Maurice Bates, III
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
