Cases 141 - 150 of 151
ABDULLAH v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00797
Petitioner:
AMIR ABDULLAH
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RODRIGUEZ v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00450
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ECHEVARRIA ANTUNA v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00438
Petitioner:
JASON ECHEVARRIA ANTUNA
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HARPER v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00391
Plaintiff:
MARCEL HARPER
Defendant:
TROY LEVI, J. MCGINNESS and D.S. KULICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWERY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2007cv00363
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. LOWERY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IRIZARRY v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv00281
Plaintiff:
EDWIN IRIZARRY
Defendant:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00232
Petitioner:
RAY JORDAN
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ZGRZEPSKI v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00184
Petitioner:
JOHN ZGRZEPSKI
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FRENCH v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00185
Petitioner:
ALLEN FRENCH
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FELIPE v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00061
Petitioner:
CESAR FELIPE
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
