Cases 141 - 150 of 249
Seaman v. Davis County Jail
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Scott Adam Seaman
Defendant:
Davis County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meditech et al v. 360training.com
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Meditech and Jari Davis
Defendant:
360training.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Belnap v. Iasis Healthcare et al
as 2:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
LeGrand P. Belnap
Defendant:
Iasis Healthcare , Salt Lake Regional Medical Center , Ben Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Select Portfolio Servicing
as 2:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Lubeck et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Dexter Paris Davis
Defendant:
Bruce Lubeck, Matthew J. Hansen, Matthew A. Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackley v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Adam Mackley
Defendant:
Lynn Davis , Thomas Patton , Lorie Fowlke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Davis County et al
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bill Adams
Defendant:
Davis County and Davis County Towing Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
IFS Financial Services et al v. Touchstone Financial of Midvale et al
as 2:2013cv00739
Plaintiff:
IFS Financial Services , Touchstone Securities and Touchstone Advisors
Defendant:
Touchstone Financial of Midvale, Touchstone Financial of Davis, Touchstone Financial of Orem and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klein v. Davis
as 2:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Lynda Swenson Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
