Cases 141 - 150 of 12,835
MALONEY v. METRO ONE LOSS PREVENTION SERVICES GROUP (GUARD DIVISION PA) INC.
as 2:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
LONDON MALONEY
Defendant:
METRO ONE LOSS PREVENTION SERVICES GROUP (GUARD DIVISION PA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SULLIVAN
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANNO et al v. REINBOWS END INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
JACEY MANNO and JILL REILLEY
Defendant:
REINBOWS END INC. and JOHN MULDOON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SULLIVAN v. GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC et al
as 2:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SULLIVAN
Defendant:
GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC and MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
HIBBARD v. GENTLE ANGELS CAREGIVING SERVICES LLC
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Amber Hibbard
Defendant:
Gentle Angels Caregiving Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES et al
as 2:2024mc00214
Respondent:
JUAN E. ALONSO, LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES and ALONSO PACHECO
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOWSER v. MID STATE AMUSEMENT CO., INC.
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
PAIGE M. BOWSER
Defendant:
MID STATE AMUSEMENT CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
URFFER v. GC WEN MANAGEMENT CORP.
as 2:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH URFFER
Defendant:
GC WEN MANAGEMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CONE v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
LISA CONE
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mayan v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mayan
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
