Cases 141 - 150 of 24,477
KING v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAIYA J. KING
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Challoner, Shelley v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Shelley M. Challoner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Albert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Albert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MONTGOMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
CATHY L. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
PERRY v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA MARIE PERRY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huskisson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Leilanie J. Huskisson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PITTMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. PITTMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vortes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Vortes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Corey Leonard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PATTISON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
SARAH G. PATTISON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
