Cases 141 - 150 of 1,578
Moellenberndt v. Nessaief et al
as 4:2022cv03178
Plaintiff:
Devin Lee Moellenberndt
Defendant:
Mohammed Nessaief, Rodriguez Emilio and Scott Frakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Stinson et al
as 8:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Brenda Mae Stinson and Amy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv03175
Plaintiff:
Yohan Webb
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Angela O'Bryan and Unknown Classification Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Neb. et al
as 8:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Dorsey Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Neb., Neb. Dept. of Corrections & Employees, Amber Gigstoel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Riedmann et al
as 8:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Shawn Titus
Defendant:
Francie C. Riedmann, Frankie J. Moore and David K. Arterburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeFever v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Luke LeFever
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ringland v. United States
as 8:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdy v. Nebraska State of
as 8:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Anthony Purdy
Defendant:
Nebraska State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Ricketts, Doug Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Nebraska DHHS et al
as 4:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
James E. Jones
Defendant:
State of Nebraska DHHS, Christopher D. Seifert, Dr. Rajeev Chattarveti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
