Cases 141 - 150 of 6,477
Hunter v. Multimetco Inc
as 1:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Elijah Wade Hunter
Defendant:
Multimetco Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Sandlin v. Tower Loan LLC
as 5:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ronald Matthew Sandlin
Defendant:
Tower Loan LLC doing business as Gulfco of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
as 7:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
Chris Thomas
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Tepole v. VL Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Tepole
Defendant:
VL Construction, LLC and Valente Lambarria-Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv01225
Defendant:
Kristy H Owens and Tammy L Henzel
Interpleader:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Thicklin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 7:2022cv01371
Plaintiff:
Virginia Thicklin
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Combs v. Big Bang Enterprises Inc
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Timothy Combs
Defendant:
Big Bang Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trammell v. Ragland, Town of
as 4:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Kevin Trammell
Defendant:
Ragland, Town of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc
as 2:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Roy Thomas Robinson
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Nichols v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Steven R Nichols
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
