Cases 141 - 150 of 1,189
Shreeves v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv02834
Plaintiff:
Brian Shreeves
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
United States of America v. Three Gold Chains With Diamond Pendants
as 1:2017cv02815
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Three Gold Chains With Diamond Pendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $21,545.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2017cv02776
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$21,545.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $82,447.00 U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$82,447.00 U.S. Currency and $3,523.00 U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Valued at Approximately $16,485.00
as 1:2017cv02452
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Assorted Jewelry Valued at Approximately $16,485.00
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One Breitling Watch et al
as 1:2017cv02496
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Breitling Watch and One Rolex Watch
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $61,614.32 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2017cv02059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$61,614.32 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1395
Steele v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv02034
Plaintiff:
Omar Steele
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
United States of America v. $11,202.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,202.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Baker v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
Tercel Baker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
