Cases 141 - 150 of 16,376
Hollenberg v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Doreen M. Hollenberg
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gin v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leigh v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Austin Leigh
Defendant:
Matthew Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dunlap v. Pogue
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Janayah Dunlap
Defendant:
Cynthia Pogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Arnold v. Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC
as 5:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Arnold
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Glasscock v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Harper Glasscock
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Infinity Ward, Inc., Sledgehammer Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sharp v. Agape Baptist Church Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sharp
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School and Bryan Clemensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 6:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ellis v. Brummett et al
as 2:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Ellis
Defendant:
Drury Brummett and Lupus Superior, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
