Cases 141 - 150 of 4,147
Ellis v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lamont Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Astin v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Robert Astin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Moseley v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lisa Moseley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Schoo v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Schoo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Torres v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Rosa Torres
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Greenspahn v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Gladis Greenspahn
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
McClure v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Calvin McClure
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bright v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dawn Bright
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Bates v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Amy Bates
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hall v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hall
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
