Cases 151 - 160 of 2,361
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., (f/n/u) Boyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., (f/n/u) Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Cathrine Boyes, (f/n/u) Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., D.W. Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Meza et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Meza, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, C. Boyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., (f/n/u) Boyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Boyes et al
as 3:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Cathline Boyes, (f/n/u) Barchlay-Dodson, D.W. Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
